Thursday, July 16, 2009

Drag to Top

Dragtotop is an interesting tool I came across today. I show the results of a search for "Family Search" here at right. Drag to Top pulls things from Google, adds twitter and news feeds, Google images, Google video, and gives a spot for comments. If you disagree with the top hits, you can drag from the full Google results to move what you think is the best hit to the top. The next Drag to Top user who performs the same search will see the one you dragged up. Over time, the more people who drag a particular hit to the top, the more it "sticks" to the top of the list. Hmmm. I guess you'd call it a search engine with social rankings modifying Google's page rankings.

I like the idea as well as the presentation and inclusion of Twitter, images, videos, etc. I wouldn't call it an earthshattering breakthrough or even something I would use regularly, but it's a great idea that portends things for the future.

From their own description:

Dragtotop.com is a manual search engine optimized by you, where you decide what is important and what should be on top. Simply drag what you like from web, images, videos and news search results to the top and let others in on the secret. Ranking your site on the first page has never been this easy.


While the Google search engine is very popular, Dragtotop brings all of what Google has and allows the users to simply Drag any site to the top and create their own search results. Search Dragtotop as you would search Google. When you find a result you like, just Drag It to the central column. Dragtotop has three columns, the first column on the left is search results from Google ; the second column shows user generated Drags and the third column is ads. Let's assume you searched for Car Dealers. The results are pulled from Google.com. If you like a search result on the third page, Simply Drag that site to the central column and next time someone searches for Car Dealers, the search result you dragged will show at the top of the second column, while the regular search results from Google will show in the first column. Your Drag will move down the list only when others drag new results on the exact same keywords.

www.dragtotop.com


Tuesday, June 23, 2009

ReFrame It!

I've been checking out an interesting FireFox Extension called ReFrame It. It allows any FireFox user to add the reframeit extension, then leave comments on any web page. Other reframeit users can see the comments when they go to the same pages, and add comments on the comments left by others. It essentially allows for commenting on web pages--you can even highlight specific parts of any web page to comment on a specific part of the page.

The disadvantages are that only other reframeit users can see the comments you left or make their own, and that it only works in FireFox. So at present, we have a tool which allows a group (think any group, team, family, or community) to share comments on any web page in the context of the web page. Even in its present form, it has a lot of potential. However, if widely adopted, the entire web could become commentable.

I played with it to add comments to the FamilySearch Wiki Home page-- see screen capture. We got a comment from a third party (the first two comments were me and my wife) which actually led to a change on the Wiki Home page. Not a bad idea...

See reframeit.com.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Odiogo, Podcasts, and iTunes

Six weeks ago, Odiogo launched a new, free service which will convert your blog text to audio and then broadcast the audio of your blog as an Internet radio broadcast, commonly called a podcast. This isn't exactly new, but what extends this interesting service even further is a new agreement with iTunes. ANY blogger can now have their blog postings converted to audio for free, and the audio podcasts will show up available as a subscription on iTunes.

This means I can subscribe to Eastman's Genealogical Newsletter on my mp3 player and listen to his newsletter postings as I drive to work--even before the newsletter is sent to my email! Yes, Dick has already jumped on the bandwagon and his newsletter is odiogo-ized. I can have my own blog postings converted to audio and set up my own "Internet radio channel" for others to follow my ramblings (I know, who would want to...?). The text to speech converter is pretty good, too.

Exciting.

Check out www.odiogo.com

Ancestry Member Connect

Ancestry has pre-announced their member connect social network and posted an image of their screen design. It's well worth taking a look. It certainly is an exciting time as leading web sites in the genealogy and family history industry try to move into the social networking world. Ancestry's blog post - http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/06/19/coming-soon-a-new-way-to-connect-with-others-researching-your-ancestors/. A partially functional preview of FamilySearch (Alpha) is also showing at http://labs.familysearch.org/alpha/index.php.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Google Wave

I’m not sure who might have already heard about Google Wave, but I’d like to share some thoughts. First some groundwork (only 2 paragraphs, not an epistle).

Groundwork
I often lament the difficulty of finding information that’s stored in numerous places. One has to be an information search guru, spend huge amounts of time sifting through mounds of data, and visit dozens of information repositories to find things. Wouldn’t it be great if I could search in just one place and find the information no matter where it is? Many thought we might have a partial solution when federated searching was first brought forward, but it hasn’t been that helpful.

When we want to get support on a product or service, we are faced with choosing the best form of getting that support—email, phone, self-help FAQ, self-help Wiki, Forum, live chat, etc. By offering support in so many ways, companies are trying to meet everyone’s needs, but perhaps they are diluting their resources and hiding what the customer needs by having it in only one of those tools, which may not be the one the customer selects. Wouldn’t it be nice if the customer didn’t have to select which tool to use, but could be directed to the help they needed in the format they desired?

Random Thoughts
In a way, one could call these two dilemmas examples of problems with information silos. Last week at Google I/O 2009, Google announced a project that has been going for a couple years called Google Wave which is intended to cross silos and remove barriers. The basic idea is to make the same content available across all formats & tools—and have it updated in all formats and tools when revised in any of them. There’s a lot more to it, but I can’t describe it without starting somewhere. What makes it exciting is that it’s Open Source. Google was engaging developers at the I/O conference to start writing extensions or even competing applications.

Google Wave allows collaborative editing. Instead of saving a document and letting people edit it one at a time, everyone looks at the same “document” at the same time and can edit collaboratively at the same time. Picture a meeting (physical or virtual). The group decides to make a list of some sort. As one person adds item 1, another is adding item 2, and a third is editing what the first person wrote on item 1 even before they come to the end of the sentence. Sounds a bit chaotic, but it has potential to facilitate virtual meetings as well as significantly shorten the time for collaborative authoring and editing.

Google Wave combines e-mail, instant messaging, and document and image sharing. It also improves it by making it real-time. You don’t’ have to see the “John is typing” message and wait for the IM sender to hit the send button, you see what he is typing as he types it. When recipients respond to Wave messages, everyone on the thread sees the replies as they are being typed.

Wave can let you post an e-mail you received to a blog (using an extension creatively called “bloggie”). If the author of the e-mail fixes a link or does some other edit to the original e-mail, or someone cc’d on the email adds a comment, the blog is automatically changed at the same time. If someone leaves a comment on the blog, it is added to the e-mail, even in the original senders “outbox.” It no longer matters whether the communication is a blog, email, tweet, IM, chat, or whatever, the content is what matters and is preserved.

There's a great extension called "spellie" (creative, aren't they?) which is a natural language spell-checker. If you type an IM saying "where r u, we bean waiting, but had to order. Their bringing been dip now," spellie will fix it to read "Where are you, we've been waiting, but had to order. They're bringing bean dip now." That's right, it knows bean from been and their from they're.

If someone is in a forum and finds an answer somewhere else to a forum post, they can copy and paste from wherever they found it. When that original source is later updated, so is the answer on the forum. Everything stays in synch.

It opens news ways to aggregate – you can automatically gather tweets on a subject into a wave (they called it a twave). Google wants developers to think of Wave as a possible enhancement to an existing workflow within an enterprise. The example used was a bug tracker used by software developers to identify and assign bugs. Bugs could be organized in waves; participants post the new bug to a global wave, then the team leader can assign bug tasks to individual team members within the wave, and developers can comment on their proposed task solution or fix for a particular bug as they are tackled and cleared, all within the same thread.

The demo was captured live and is online at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_UyVmITiYQ. It's a long one, so here's a few timestamps for some key points:

20:42 - link to content in a blog, or pull blog content into something else (forum, wiki, e-mail, webpage...)
36:30 - More than one person can edit the same "document" at the same time, with each seeing each others typing real-time.
1:02:30 - Link e-mail, blog, wiki page, or whatever, to an answer in a v-bulletin forum, and have the forum automatically updated whenever the linked item is updated or commented on (example given bug tracker)
1:13:30 - Rosie, an extension which translates instantaneously as you type to/from over 30 languages


I’ve also included below some comments found on blogs:

Technologizer:
[Wave takes] what e-mail should be and melds it with IM, allows for real-time document sharing, provides instant photo sharing, revolutionizes spell checking, provides on-the-fly translation, and allows developers to either build on top of the service or replace it with their own underpinnings, among other things.

Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu:
The part about Wave that excites us at Zoho is the interoperability it can bring to collaborative applications. While data formats are open and you can export/import out of Google or Zoho apps, from a real time collaboration perspective, these are still somewhat islands. Wave is an ambitious attempt to standardize the underlying real time protocol & rich document collaboration. If this attempt at standardization succeeds (a big if, I agree), it opens to way for a whole new set of applications.

Joel Dehlin (LDS-CIO) –
Wow!

Monday, March 23, 2009

Widget for collecting site ratings

Here's a new web widget--Mochimention. Mochimention allows any website to add user ratings to its website. There's apparently plans to add some form of e-commerce based on ratings. I'm not sure how good their product is since I'm not ready to try this, but the idea is a great one. Check it out at http://www.killerstartups.com/Blogging-Widgets/mochimention-com-what-others-think-does-matter.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Reviews, Ratings, and vettings of websites

I have been using a great bookmark synching service called FoxMarks. Whenever I add a bookmark at home, it automatically adds it to my computer at work--and vice versa. Now, FoxMarks has moved to supporting Internet Explorer instead of just FireFox, and will soon add Safari. They've changed their name to XMarks.

At the same time, they've added several services. They pool all the bookmarks from all their many users and establish a sort of vetting or rating based on how many of their users have the site bookmarked. The more people who have bookmarked a site, the higher rating it gets.

They've added the ability for their users to write reviews on any website they've bookmarked, and have the reviews available to any of their users. Finally, they work behind the scenes to grab your Google searches, and automatically annotate the Google Search Results with the sites in the search results which have been bookmarked by any XMarks users and further rank the Google search results according to their XMarks ranking.

Check it out

Friday, March 13, 2009

Social Networking for the Dead

As I was at lunch at the FamilySearch Developer’s conference (11 March 2009), one of the individuals at my table (Daniel) said “what we need is social networking for the dead.” As I thought about it, I became more and more enthusiastic about the concept.

Why not have pages for our ancestors, containing information about them and the people they came in contact with--their friends and associates? Why not let their descendants browse not only information and records about their ancestor, but also about their ancestors’ friends—those who lived in the same area at the same time, who participated in the same events, belonged to the same religious or ethnic groups, served in the same military regiment, immigrated in the same group or traveled on the same ship or wagon train?

We could have a social network for our ancestors, linking them to others in with things in common. If our ancestors didn't leave a journal about the voyage or the regiment, maybe once of their friends did. This would allow us to learn more about the history and background of our ancestors' lives. This idea has merit, and may be well worth pursuing.